-->
Save your seat for 纽约流媒体 this May. 现在注册!

What Do OTT Consumers Want?

What does the data tell us about OTT consumer preferences and trends, and how can platform providers interpret it to improve reach and reduce churn? 首席执行官埃文•夏皮罗 ESHAP, discusses these questions with Jon Giegengack, Principal and Founder, Hub Entertainment 研究, and Paul Erickson, Founder and Principal, 埃里克森的策略 & 的见解, in this clip from their panel at 流媒体 Connect 2023.

Shapiro notes that Giegengack and Hub Entertainment 研究 regularly conduct consumer research about entertainment preferences. 他问, “From looking back over the last two years of your surveys, what do you think the consumer is saying to us right now?”

Giegengack says that while people are using more entertainment sources of all kinds, 视频占据了主导地位. “It peaked last year at a little more than seven sources per person,他说. “It went down a little bit for the first time this year to a little more than six, but that's still the second-highest number we've ever seen. So, people are availing themselves of all of these different options. They're kind of creating their own bundles, their own stacks of video services, some of them that do similar things.”

然而, Giegengack says that while people are excited about the sheer amount of options available to them, the vast array of choices has become an issue. “The amount of stuff they're trying to use in the same 24-hour day creates this environment where they have two problems,他说. 一个是复杂性. So just the task of trying to use all of these platforms that don't necessarily exist within one bundle yet.” The other issue, he says, is rooted in value. “People are a lot more willing to spend on TV than they are some other things. But as these stacks get bigger, they are less willing to take a flyer and try out a new paid platform just for the heck of it to see what it's like. And they're thinking a lot harder about, ‘Am I getting enough value out of this or enough utility for what I'm paying?’ That's different than how much something costs. There are things that cost more than other things that people still think [are] more valuable because they have better utility. But I think they're looking with a lot keener eye at, ‘Am I getting enough use out of this platform [for it] to be worth it?“如果他们没有, they're more likely to drop it and take that money and transfer it to something different.”

Shapiro discusses a recent study he’d seen that breaks down the numbers of media usage by both age demographics and value. “Under 35 consumers have something like 16 services free and paid that they use on a regular basis,他说. “35岁以上有11个. 但这两种情况下, out of all the 'must-have' media that they have, only half of that 16 is considered must-have, which means the other half is at risk on an ongoing basis.”

夏皮罗问埃里克森, “When you look out across the data you've seen with the clients that you have, what have you seen that effectively moves [a user] from ‘nice to have’ to ‘must have?’ Are you seeing different platforms, 程序员, or publishers utilize content or packaging differently to move their services from the ‘kind of nice to have, but disposable’ to that ‘must have’ column?

“That's a magic question for a lot of services,” Erickson says. “You have what they can do within their own content portfolio, which is to get better at personalization, making sure that they're super serving [the viewer]…it's an ongoing issue with OTT in that it's a bit unfair to compare it to traditional pay TV because that dynamic of locking people in it will never be the same as it is with traditional pay TV…”

Shapiro says, “A large bundle, and then within that bundle to the triple play itself too.”

“It's always going to be easier to leave an OTT service, that just goes with it,” Erickson says. “So I think that going forward, we see certain services that are very niche doing well. So we know that people are very interested in certain niches, and they're often willing to leave a service if that show they like is not there. So you get strength in collaboration…I mean, you've done the most you can do personalization-wise, you have figured out how to really engage your particular viewership. Then the next extension beyond that sometimes is to find out, “好吧, so what can we do from a packaging perspective? What can we do from other companies within our own corporate portfolio to where the collective is the most effective?’ So I think we're going to see a lot of evolution towards exploring these bundles and collaborations as a way of extending the power of what you can do within your own content portfolio.”

Learn more about a wide range of streaming industry topics at the next 流媒体 Connect in November 2023.

流媒体覆盖
免费的
合资格订户
现在就订阅 最新一期 过去的问题
相关文章

The State of FAST: Around the Horn with Fubo, Estrella Media, and HARTBEAT

With all the talk of FAST 2.0 and the explosion of FAST channels to the point of approaching market saturation, is FAST's self-reinvention a foregone conclusion, or even advisable at this juncture? What are the new and emerging FAST growth strategies that are driving growth today, as opposed to a year or two ago? And how have the strikes in Hollywood that consumed at least 2 quarters of the year impacted channel and content development?

Next is NOW - Part Two of Evan Shapiro's NAB NY Keynote Address

Read Part Two of our breakdown of media cartographer Evan Shapiro's in-depth NAB NY analysis of the existential threats that the M&E产业面临着. Evan used his unique way of viewing the data flowing through the media and entertainment industry's ecosystem to present a distinctive understanding of what's occurring and where things are headed.

Evan Shapiro Says “What’s Next” for the M&E Industry Is Already Here at NAB New York 2023

In his keynote address at NAB New York, media cartographer Evan Shapiro emphasized the existential threat that the M&E产业面临着. Audience consumption behaviors and business models are being disrupted. Evan used his unique way of viewing the data flowing through the media and entertainment industry's ecosystem to present a distinctive understanding of what's occurring and where things are headed.

How Premium and 免费的mium OTT Content Strategies Differ

When it comes to leveraging and building an audience for premium OTT content, how do strategies differ for premium ad-supported content and subscription-based content? Roku VP Jenn Vaux and ESHAP's Evan Shapiro discuss how and why these strategic approaches differ in this clip from 流媒体 Connect 2023.

Scripps' Yazmin Wickham Talks OTT App Development & 内容策略

流媒体's Tim Siglin sits down with Yazmin Wickham of Scripps' Network to discuss OTT app development and content strategies in this exclusive interview from 流媒体 East 2023.

How to Ease OTT Consumers Into Behind-the-Paywall Content

Is local news the ultimate gateway drug for streaming TV services like NBCUniversal's Peacock, as they try to attract customers to their premium paid content offerings? Chicken Soup for the Soul's Philippe Guelton discusses this topic with ESHAP CEO Evan Shapiro in this clip from 流媒体 Connect 2023.

Is Too Much Choice Making OTT UX Unmanageable?

How much choice is too much choice for OTT media and entertainment consumers? Is content and channel overwhelm ruining the user experiences for OTT audiences who just want to find something to watch? And is more bundling the solution? Find out what Media Cartographer Evan Shapiro and Applicaster Co-founder Jonathan Laor have to say on the subject in this clip from 流媒体 Connect 2023.

What's Driving OTT Ad Revenue Today

As ad-driven monetization increasingly takes center stage in the OTT and premium content worlds today, where is the ad spend growing fastest, and how is the underlying tech evolving? Quickplay's Chris Drake and Altman Solon's Jonathan Hurd discuss current and emerging trends in ad-based streaming content monetization--particularly in the sports world--in this clip from a panel at 流媒体 West 2022.

Top KPIs for OTT UX Design

How do you measure what's working and what isn't in OTT user experience design? Vevo的艾琳·杰克逊报道, Hartbeat's Solan Strickling, and Philo's Thijs Lowette identify their UX KPIs of choice in this panel from 流媒体 West 2022.